Posts Tagged ‘review’
Origin’s Genesis gaming desktop gets reviewed: blisteringly fast, but oh-so-pricey
Posted by: Gadget Boy in Gadget News, Technology on January 22nd, 2010
Origin's Genesis gaming desktop gets reviewed: blisteringly fast, but oh-so-pricey originally appeared on Engadget on Thu, 21 Jan 2010 19:10:00 EST. Please see our terms for use of feeds.
Permalink |
Hot Hardware | Email this | Comments Intel’s Arrandale and Clarkdale CPUs get benchmarked for your enjoyment
Posted by: Gadget Boy in Gadget News, Technology on January 4th, 2010

Arrandale reviews
Read - HotHardware
Read - AnandTech
Read - Tom's Hardware
Read - PCPerspective
Read - Legit Reviews
Clarkdale reviews
Read - NeoSeeker
Read - HotHardware
Read - HardcoreWare
Read - TechSpot
Read - AnandTech
Read - PCPerspective
Read - Legion Hardware
Read - TweakTown
Read - Overclockers Club
Intel's Arrandale and Clarkdale CPUs get benchmarked for your enjoyment originally appeared on Engadget on Mon, 04 Jan 2010 01:09:00 EST. Please see our terms for use of feeds.
Permalink | | Email this | CommentsThinkPad Edge Review: A Murky Middle Ground [Review]
Posted by: Gadget Boy in Gadget News, Technology on January 4th, 2010
Somewhere between the buttoned-up utility of the ThinkPad and the sleek efficiency of the IdeaPad sits an untapped sweet spot for affordable, entry-level notebooks. At least, that's clearly what Lenovo is banking on with their new ThinkPad Edge series.
The ThinkPad Edge purports to be targeted towards small and medium-sized businesses, but it's just as easy to say that it's equally unfit for both casual users and serious professionals. While it's a perfectly capable machine in most respects and a decent buy for the money, it often feels like a compromise to an argument no one was having.
Price and Configuration
The system we tested was loaded up with a 1.3 GHz Intel Core 2 Duo SU7300 ULV processor and Intel GS45 chipset, and 4GB (2x2GB) of DDR3 RAM (1066MHz). You can also customize up to 500 GB of HDD storage. That set-up will run you $899, while the $549 base model ships with either AMD's Turion (clocked at 1.6GHz) or Althon (1.5 GHz) dual core processor, 4GB (2x2GB) of DDR2 RAM (667MHz), and a 160GB HDD.
Design
The mash-up is clear the instant you unbox the Edge. The rounded corners and glossy black finish are reminiscent of the IdeaPad, but when combined with the ThinkPad-like flat display back, the 13.3" model I reviewed (14" and 15" models will be available in the spring) brings to mind a futuristic cafeteria tray.
The reflective gloss is also a fingerprint trap, so expect a lot of smudges unless you're prepared to give your notebook regular wipe-downs.
The 13.3", 720p (1366x768) screen offers better sharpness than you might expect from an entry-level rig. There's no latch to keep it closed, but it opens easily on its hinges. And my god is this thing flexible: I'm not sure why you'd ever want it to, but the display can recline over 180 degrees.
Like the rest of the ThinkPad line, the Edge comes equipped with both a trackpad and a TrackPoint nub. The trackpad's multitouch capabilities are appreciated, but its narrowness and frenetic responses definitely aren't. As for the nub, I've never been a big fan, but it's integrated well with the keyboard and works just dandy, if you're into that kind of thing.
Speaking of that keyboard: the island style that Lenovo has moved to for the Edge is a welcome design improvement over previous ThinkPad models. It's less industrial, more welcoming. The keys are raised and have some spring to them, and while they feel a bit blocky at times it's overall a smooth typing experience.
The Edge also has the distinction of being a thin and light notebook that's not that thin (one inch, although the 6-cell battery in our test model adds another .5 inches in the rear) and not that light (3.6 lbs. with a 4-cell battery and about 4 lbs. with the 6-cell). But it's still portable enough that it wouldn't be cumbersome to take on all of those small and medium-sized business trips.
The ports are distributed along the sides, as on the IdeaPad, and it's a decent array: three USB ports, VGA out, HDMI, and a multi-card reader to go along with your standard ethernet, microphone, and speaker jacks. Conspicuously absent is a DVD drive.
The Edge's solution to potential design blemishes like speakers and the battery appears to be to sweep them under the rug. The speakers are placed on the notebook's underside, and offer decent—though at times tinny—sound quality. I actually love the battery solution: its placement underneath the rear of the computer creates a natural keyboard incline.
Performance
This isn't a computer you're going to want to do intensive gaming on (thanks largely to the integrated graphics), but then again it's not supposed to be. To its credit, the Edge does handle streaming HD videos without a hitch for when you need a Muppets Bohemian Rhapsody fix at the office.
As far as benchmarks, the Edge falls where you'd expect it to: somewhere between the IdeaPad U350 and the ThinkPad T400. A more appropriate comparison would be another 13" thin-and-light like the Asus UL30A, and our GeekBench testing indicates that the two are pretty evenly matched.
Bottom line, you're not going to want to do much more with the ThinkPad Edge than get on the internet, send some emails, and bang out a few Excel spreadsheets. And that's what it's designed to do. Then again, so are netbooks.
Battery Life
Here's where the Edge really delivers. Lenovo claims that the six-cell Intel model gets an impressive 7.8 hours of battery life. I tested our system with higher performance settings, medium screen brightness, Bluetooth off, and a page automatically reloading every 30 seconds on Firefox to simulate active web browsing.
Total Run Time: 5 hours, 20 minutes
And that obviously can be further improved by settling for lower performance/higher battery life settings.
The Reason of Edge?
So what has Lenovo introduced to the world? A lot of not quite. It's a thin-and-light that's not quite either. It's a notebook that's not quite powerful enough for heavy lifting and not quite affordable enough for casual use. It has a contemporary design that's not quite, well, smudge-proof. And for all it does right, this new ThinkPad still strikes me as a computer with a target audience that's not quite identifiable.
At its introductory price point, the Edge sounds like a competitive machine, but remember that you're also losing most of the things that distinguish it in the first place-the ULV Intel processor and the 6-cell battery, in particular. Honestly, if you're in the market for a new notebook, there's a good chance Lenovo already has something that fits exactly what you're looking for. And that it's called either IdeaPad or ThinkPad.
Solid battery life
Good number of ports
Island-style keyboard is a welcome improvement
Glossy top is a smudge-magnet
Frenetic track-pad
Who is this really for?
Lenovo ThinkPad Edge 13 review
Posted by: Gadget Boy in Gadget News, Technology on January 3rd, 2010

Continue reading Lenovo ThinkPad Edge 13 review
Lenovo ThinkPad Edge 13 review originally appeared on Engadget on Sun, 03 Jan 2010 18:25:00 EST. Please see our terms for use of feeds.
Permalink | | Email this | CommentsOCZ Vertex 2 Pro SSD previewed: awesome, and could do with some 6Gbps SATA love
Posted by: Gadget Boy in Gadget News, Technology on January 1st, 2010
OCZ Vertex 2 Pro SSD previewed: awesome, and could do with some 6Gbps SATA love originally appeared on Engadget on Fri, 01 Jan 2010 07:05:00 EST. Please see our terms for use of feeds.
Permalink |
AnandTech | Email this | Comments Ion netbooks head-to-head: Atom, overcharged?
Posted by: Gadget Boy in Gadget News, Technology on December 30th, 2009

Continue reading Ion netbooks head-to-head: Atom, overcharged?
Ion netbooks head-to-head: Atom, overcharged? originally appeared on Engadget on Wed, 30 Dec 2009 15:30:00 EST. Please see our terms for use of feeds.
Permalink | | Email this | CommentsCamangi WebStation Android Tablet Reviewed [Review]
Posted by: Gadget Boy in Gadget News, Technology on December 29th, 2009
Michael Smith received his Camangi WebStation tablet yesterday, and spent all night turning out a review. If you were at all considering buying one, you'll definitely want to hear what he has to say.
We called in one of our own, and it's quite possible our impressions will differ. But until then...
While the world waits for Apple to release official news about their new tablet computer, a few smaller (and lesser known) companies are releasing their own touch screen tablets. Archos has a few models out, there's the viliv, and then there's the whole CrunchPad thing which is now called the JooJoo. And I've never played with any of them. I have however been (for some reason) drooling for an iSlate for the past year or so. And in my impatience I prematurely ordered a Camangi WebStation and am ready to report the bad news.
First let me do the whole reviewer disclaimer thing. On what can only be described as a moment of weak ignorance, I ordered a Camangi WebStation. That was December 4th and I paid full price. Normally I wouldn't plop down almost $400 for a product that no one has seen or tested yet, one that in the early videos looked quite questionable, and one from a company that I've never heard of before. But I did. Against all common sense I hoped that it would be a decent solution to use until Apple gets theirs out.
At the same time I also contacted Camangi in an attempt to get an early "review unit." We did correspond back and forth a bit but ultimately they decided to not supply me with a "free" unit but rather promised to simply ship my purchased unit to me via a faster method than everyone else's – so that I could review it (hopefully) before they start arriving to the 1000′s of people who ordered them. Therefore the unit I reviewed here is the one I paid full price for, and my buyer's remorse is certainly adding to the sting here a bit. But then again most things I discuss on this site are items that I've purchased. So take that bias in to account if you feel it's relevant.
My Couch Computing Concept
Our previous current couch computer is the hacintoshed Dell Mini 9. It works well, is fairly fast (for an Atom processor running OS X), it's fully a Mac, and cost about $300-$400 retail. And it's small. We mostly use it for quick IMDB look-ups while watching TV and movies, and my daughter plays flash games on it. So in my perfect world, the ultimate couch computer would be a smallish tablet, no keyboard to get in the way, easy to stow between couch cushions, but would be as fast and responsive as the Dell or as an iPhone. It needs to have full web capabilities, support flash video (unlike the iPhone), Hulu, YouTube, and all that. It should also act as a PMP so that my daughter can watch videos on it in the car or wherever. It needs to be multi-useful.

So I've been excited about getting this unit in – and I spent all Christmas watching the DHL tracking reports to see when it would arrive. But on the other hand I didn't have high expectations for it. It has very little RAM and a tiny processor. In my correspondence with Camangi I asked over and over about its capabilities, specifically with regards to playing video – but they would not answer those questions. This made me begin to think that the reason they were avoiding my questions (and didn't want to send me a review unit) was because they didn't like the true answers.
What's in the Box
The package arrived via DHL in a small brown paper box, inside which was the retail box. The box contains the WebStation, a carry sleeve/pouch, a pair of cheap earphones that appear to have a microphone attached, a cloth to wipe the screen, a quick start guide, another booklet containing legal disclaimers, the power supply, and the stand to use it as a picture frame, which is basically a suction cup on a stick.

My first impressions were that the WebStation hardware seemed sturdy enough. It has three physical buttons on the front: home, quick menu, and return. On the right side there are ports for headphones, mini USB, a reset button, a normal sized USB, and DC in. On the left side are physical volume buttons, on the top is a power button, and on the top back is a micro SD card slot preloaded with an 8GB stick.

(same side from the back…)

On major thing lacking in the box is a real user manual. The quickstart guide does tell you how to unlock the device, something you'd probably never figure out on your own. But it's very slim on details and instructions. For example, I still have no idea how to load music on the device. I assume that I need to add a "Music" folder to the memory stick, but that is a complete guess. Another example is that I was surprised to discover that it would charge off the USB cable when it's plugged in to my Mac. But also baffled by the meaning of the "beep-beep-beep" when the screen went to sleep while plugged in to my Mac.

Powering It On
When you first press the power button at the top, it takes about 7 seconds before you see the word "ANDROID." Total boot time is 54 seconds. You are then presented with a lock screen that shows the time/date. Unlocking it takes you to the Launcher, which is a menu of app icons.

Speed and Responsiveness
You have to admit that we're all used to the way the iPhone works and in a way it is the standard upon which all other touch based gadgets are measured. Since the loss of my 3GS iPhone I've been back to using my old original Edge phone and have been struggling with the comparitive slowness of that old thing. But the old Edge phone screams in comparison to the WebStation. Actions like touching and dragging to scroll windows are taken for granted on the iPhone, and the WebStation does do that touch scrolling thing, but seems to skip along the action. One way to describe it is if the iPhone operates at 30 frames per second, the WebStation probably runs at about 5 to 10. I also found myself accidentally triggering buttons when trying to scroll. Something that does happen on the iPhone occasionally, but was happening a lot on the WebStation. And with the overall slowness of the unit, getting into the wrong menu is a pain because then you have to slowly navigate out of it as well.

Here are some speed/usage comparison examples between the WebStation and my old first-gen iPhone:
Photos – First off, it's not a multitouch display, it is a resistive single touch screen. So zooming in and out is done via on-screen zoom icons, not multitouch pinch actions. The fair comparison here is the responsiveness of touch-dragging scroll around on a photo. When you first touch and start to drag it takes several seconds before the unit seems to know that you're dragging. Then it catches up and does it's best to keep up with your finger, updating the screen about 5 to 10 times per second. This sluggishness is generally felt everywhere in the UI.
Typing – When you click on a field where text can be entered, a virtual touch keyboard appears on the bottom of the screen. Typing is best done one letter at a time, making sure that the UI has got your letter before moving on to the next. If you type too fast sometimes the keyboard will just go away. It seems to not be able to keep track of touches faster than about 5 per second either. Of course this kills my couch computer concept as it's sort of frustrating to even enter text.
I'll cover web browsing and video playback in their own sections.
But first I have to say that I was excited about the WebStation being Google Android-based. I don't even mind it NOT being multitouch. I think the overall interface is good, but the processor just can't keep up with a real user. If this was powered with the Atom processor from my Dell Mini 9 it would be a completely different story. But the way it is now the sluggishness is just too much of a factor.
Web Browsing
I think the biggest test should be basic web browsing. After all, the product is called the WEB station, and therefore should be optimized at surfing the web. The first test was to simultaneously launched both the WebStation and my old first gen iPhone to the home page of this website (tomorrowland.com). Both devices were on my home Wi-Fi network. The iPhone loaded the page about 20 seconds quicker than the WebStation. Then trying to test scrolling on the WebStation I touched and dragged the screen and instead of it scrolling it launched a link. In order to ensure that you're going to scroll you have to touch and hold until you see that it's scrolling, then drag your finger. Something that I would find hard to do when going back and forth between using my iPhone and this thing.
The next test is what sites work and what doesn't. Well, just like the iPhone, flash does not work. This wipes out Hulu and YouTube and even my own tomorrowland.com/podcast page, and unlike the iPhone there is no YouTube application. This also wipes out all flash games, which was one of my desired uses for the WebStation.
I've already complained about the typing and the scrolling. But one other thing I noticed is that most apps are web apps. The ebook reader, and the app marketplace both use the web browser to do their thing. So if one is slow they all are.
Video
All my hopes and dreams are crushed when it comes to video playback. It's no wonder the people at Camangi completely skirted all of my questions about video playback. My big question to them was can it play full screen video at 30fps. The answer is a big fat no way! Not even close. With the lack of a user manual to detail the specifications for the most compatible video formats I guessed and loaded a couple of samples. The unit did come preloaded with the promo video from this page, but looks atrocious when playing back. It seems a shame to not make use of that 800 x 480 pixel screen with movie watching.
The first video I tried was a 3 minute, 22 MB H.264 video running at about 1 Mbps. Frame size was 480 x 324 at 30fps. I suppose it was encoded to work on an iPod. The audio played fine but the picture lagged very far behind, causing it to be grossly out of sync. The video frames that played did so at about 5 or 10 fps. Skipping to the middle of the video did catch it up, but it's clear the device is not powerful enough to play video.
The second video I tried was a movie that was encoded to play on a PSP. It also played very slow visually while the audio played normally. It was also very much out of sync right from the beginning. Very disappointing.
Harsh Conclusion
My suspicion is that the unit is basically a digital picture frame loaded with a cell phone version Google Android with a touch screen. It came with a phone headset complete with a mic and answer button. All through the menus there are mentions of things like "baseband" and "ringtones" but it's not a phone. And the weird thing is that I don't think the processor in it is even powerful enough to run a phone. Had they marketed it as a touch screen digital photo frame with a web browser and sold it for about $100 it would be somewhat reasonable. And before you think about complaining about how hard I'm being on it, consider this: The WebStation is $390. For $199 you can get an iPod Touch. If mac made a 7 inch iPod touch it would blow this thing out of the water. Completely. Or for about the same price you could get a Dell Mini 9, or an Archos 7 – which are completely different products, but still something to consider. Or you could save your money and wait for Apple to release the iSlate and I suspect that will be the CE product of 2010.
Of course there is more to the WebStation that I didn't have time to cover, but to be honest the rest really doesn't matter. The weather app is nice and works well. So far I haven't figured out how to load music on it and so haven't been able to try out it's ‘cover flow' mode. But essentially it's about as powerful as a digital picture frame, and that's very sad. Basically my plan at this point is to call American Express and find out what I can do to return and refund. In my opinion the Camangi WebStation is a total fail and I can't recommend it to anyone at any price.
Reprinted with permission from Tomorrowland.com.
SteelSeries Xai HD Gaming Mouse Review: Amazingly Ambidextrous [Review]
Posted by: Gadget Boy in Gadget News, Technology on December 29th, 2009
An outlier in PC gaming, SteelSeries' gear won't outglow Chernobyl. It's unassuming and utilitarian, like ThinkPads. They take themselves a little too seriously. But Xai is possibly the best ambidextrous gaming mouse I've ever used, despite the ridiculous HD gimmick.
Price
It's $90, both MSRP and on Amazon.
Verdict
I generally don't like ambidextrous mice. SteelSeries says they spent three years researching the ergonomics on Xai, and while it sounds crazy, it worked. The form factor is so good it feels almost like an ergonomic mouse. Bucking the trend of growing fatter and more bulbous (have you seen some of Microsoft's mice lately?) for a more streamlined, average form factor, it's an amorphous enough shape that most people will like, and no one will hate (or, conversely, truly love). The one flaw is that you're going to hit the two periphery buttons that are on the opposite side of your thumb whenever you pick up the mouse to move it, so I wound up disabling them altogether.
Xai has a monochrome LCD carved into the bottom of its ass, which sounds excessive, but it's actually quite functional: You can adjust any setting, and any of your five on-board stored profiles (which includes macros, CPI settings, etc.), directly on the mouse (bye bye, crappy mouse software). It's supremely useful. Though if you're doing more than switching from one profile to the next, you'll want to wait until you're in between matches, otherwise you're gonna get killed since the whole process of saying, changing your CPI count to slow down or speed up the mouse can take up to 30 seconds.
An issue, though, is that you only have immediate access to two CPI settings—the triangle on top flips between two alternate CPIs per profile, meaning if you want to cycle through several different speeds, you've gotta turn the mouse over and switch to a whole different profile, so if you're an aggressive mouse speed switcher (like if you're a serious sniper), that could be a dealbreaker.
There is a certain amount of spec horseshit you're swallowing with all gaming mice, most commonly couched in terms of dots per inch. SteelSeries attempts to differentiate by more precisely referring to counts per inch, which is basically the same thing—the number of increments the mouse can read in one inch of movement. Real world—well in gaming anyway—it basically translates into how fast you can turn or move your cursor, which speeds up as you ramp up the CPI. As you can imagine, the speed gets progressively more pointless, with the current "standard" of 4000DPI being about as useful as tits on a boar. Xai's money spec, if you will, is that it processes 12,000 frames a second at 5,001 CPI at movement speeds of 150 inches a second using a 10.8MP "high definition" sensor.
Guess what? I didn't test that while playing Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2, Left 4 Dead 2 or Team Fortress 2, because no one moves their arm 150 inches a second. I will say, though, it tracks as well as—though not noticeably better than—any current generation gaming mouse, both on regular pads, and the 9HD special "HD" gaming pad SteelSeries has released for it.
If you want a gaming mouse you can use with either hand, I'd say you can't do better than Xai, though I might wait until it's a little bit cheaper. Also, I wish they'd drop the stupid, meaningless "HD" spiel. It's a mouse, not a TV.
Awesome ergonomics for an ambidextrous mouse
You can change any setting directly on the mouse
Changing settings on the mouse is a little slow
It's $90!
The HD thing is dumb
Ricoh GXR review roundup
Posted by: Gadget Boy in Gadget News, Technology on December 25th, 2009

Ricoh GXR review roundup originally appeared on Engadget on Fri, 25 Dec 2009 18:44:00 EST. Please see our terms for use of feeds.
Permalink
1001 Noisy Cameras |
Waloszek, Wouter, Photography Blog | Email this | Comments Aluratek Libre Budget Ebook Review [Review]
Posted by: Gadget Boy in Gadget News, Technology on December 25th, 2009
Ereaders are still at the point where the price is slightly too high and the functionality is slightly too low to purchase on a whim. Aluratek’s LCD-based reader, however, offers a damn low price but sacrifices functionality in return.
The Price:
$180
The Verdict:
Relatively cheap, compared to the major ereader brands, but it’s probably the worst ebook reader we’ve tested.
Instead of going for an e-ink screen like the Kindle or the Nook, Aluratek went with a monochrome LCD screen. This is fine, in theory, because it keeps costs low and actually improves refresh rates, it also sacrifices battery life. For example, I could only make it through 80% of the 7th Harry Potter book before it demanded to be charged. You’re looking at a day or two’s worth of reading at best, and by that I mean reading on and off and not for 24 hours straight.
Performance is pretty horrible as well. Aluratek seems to have only put in a processor strong enough to turn the pages at a decent speed, because startup times, navigation and book loading times were atrociously bad. Granted, this won’t be an issue when you’re actually reading books, which is most of the time.
The worst thing about the reader is probably the button placement. There are three ways you can turn a page: using the page turn buttons on the bottom left, the arrow keys on the bottom right or the page toggle on the left edge of the screen. They’re all pretty clumsy. The bottom left and bottom right methods are too far down the reader for you to hold your hand in that position while you’re reading, so you’ll have to move it down every time you want to advance. As for the left hand slider toggle, those traction edges that they placed in there to make it easier to grip and scroll is actually too rough for my delicate hands, so I avoided using it when possible. Basically, they’ve got an ebook reader that’s difficult to turn the pages with.
Even if you go beyond the lousy controls, the sub-par performance and the LCD screen that’s not all that readable, you’ve still got yourself a fairly cheap ereader, and it’s somewhat compact as well. If you’re someone who actually doesn’t mind reading books on their computers, this is one—albeit tiny—step higher. [Aluratek]
Screen refreshes faster than e-ink readers
It’s cheap (relatively)
Slow
Awkward button placement
Lousy battery life












