Posts Tagged ‘Publishers’

Wary Book Publishers Are Fighting the Future [Books]

Last week, a host of book publishers, led by Simon & Schuster, said they will delay publication of e-reader versions of many books because they were afraid the electronic copies were cannibalizing sales of more expensive hardcover editions.

As Carolyn Reidy, chief executive of Simon & Schuster, told The Associated Press, "We believe that a large portion of the people who have bought e-readers are from the most devoted reading population. And if they like the e-readers, they are naturally going to convert because the e-books are so significantly less expensive."

I own both an Amazon Kindle and a Sony Reader, and I can tell you that I didn't buy them to save money. I know a lot of other avid bookworms, and I can't recall a single one citing "to save money on books" as their reason to purchase one of these fancy new devices.

How can e-books represent saving money when an person spends between $250 to $300 on a device and about $10 for each book?

No, these are people who love books so much that they want to carry a collection of them around on a single device and want to interact more deeply with them (such as looking up words in a built-in dictionary, sharing content with others and taking notes about what they're reading).

Most importantly, e-reader users want instant access to books—if you hear about a new book that sounds interesting, you can start reading it a couple of minutes later.

Publishers are understandably worried about their changing business model, as they face new pressures from authors as well as readers. But do they really believe that they will boost their bottom lines by making it harder for these devoted readers to buy books?

Let's say you unwrap your holiday presents and see a fancy Kindle, Sony Reader or Barnes & Noble Nook. Just what you've always wanted! You turn on your new device, navigate to a wireless bookstore and search for Don DeLillo's new novel. Instead of a simple click and download right from your armchair, you're told it's only available in hardcover for the next four months.

Are you really going to put down your new book reader, get in your car, drive to the store and buy the hardcover? Probably not. Instead, you'll click the ‘back' button and search for something else to read in the digital bookstore.

The consumer understands that digital means immediate and infinite, and the limits imposed by paper no longer exist. As Amazon's chief executive, Jeffrey Bezos, noted in a recent interview with The New York Times, "For every 100 copies of a physical book we sell, where we have the Kindle edition, we will sell 48 copies of the Kindle edition. It won't be too long before we're selling more electronic books than we are physical books."

Yet some publishers are trying to do everything they can to look the other way and pretend the new products and delivery pathways haven't changed old business models.

There's one other important factor to swirl into this discussion: The next generation of book buyers won't understand why they can't access any information they want in a digital format. They have grown up in a world where everything, from movies to magazines, is basically just a collection of digital bytes.

And the economics of bytes aren't the same as the economics of atoms. Infinite digital bits don't have to deal with the supply-and-demand business models that once existed. You create one version and can disseminate it everywhere, instantly, at virtually no distribution cost. (Can you imagine if the digital camera you just purchased gave you this warning: "We're sorry. You won't be able to e-mail this photo to your friend for another four months. Instead, why don't you print a copy and mail it through or on-demand printing service!")

The publishers seem to be picking a fight with the wrong team: their customer. They are punishing the people who buy their content instead of making it simple for those customers to hand over their money, instantly, from any location in the world.

I can tell you one thing: When I'm looking for a new book on my Kindle and told I have to wait four months for the e-book version, I won't be heading to the bookstore. Instead, I'll click the back button and buy one of the 360,000 other e-books available now.

Reprinted with permission from the NY Times.




, , , , , , , , ,

No Comments


Analyst noise: Apple tablet in March for $1k, publishers on-board, Verizon iPhone coming too
If you've been following mainstream news today, then it's likely you've seen the story doing the rounds on new Apple tablet rumors, spurred by a note sent to clients from Oppenheimer analyst Yair Reiner. Never heard of him? That's not surprising, since he has no real connection to Apple, and his job mainly consists of telling people how to move their money around -- a Master of the Universe gear-cranker, you might say. Anyhow, Yair is sure that Apple will be releasing its 10.1-inch, multitouch tablet around March or April, with a ramp-up on production sometime in February. He also notes that the device will sell for $1,000 (so far we've heard rumored price points from $699 all the way up to $2,000), but ultimately Reiner seems most concerned with how it will impact Amazon, the Kindle, and book and media publishers.

According to the note, Apple has been in talks with publishers concerning a "very attractive proposal" in which the company will split revenue with publishing houses 70 / 30, as they do with iTunes and App Store sales (just as we speculated in our post on the Time Inc. digimag). What's most disconcerting about the report is that it seems more interested in disrupting or dismissing what Amazon is doing (particularly noteworthy as the company is in the midst of its biggest season for Kindle sales ever). When financial analysts start squawking in this manner, we like to approach with caution. As of right now, we have zero solid evidence that Apple is even producing a tablet, let alone ready to drop one for a G come March. We have heard plenty of other rumors that corroborate much of this, but if the above is the plan, you can expect a big reveal from Cupertino around the time of Macworld or CES, so you won't have to wait long to know the truth. For now, keep your BS detectors set to "stun."

P.S.: See what we mean? Now a Piper Jaffray analyst is 70 percent certain (70 percent!) that Apple will introduce an iPhone for Verizon in 2010. Hold onto your hats folks, we've only just begun.

Analyst noise: Apple tablet in March for $1k, publishers on-board, Verizon iPhone coming too originally appeared on Engadget on Wed, 09 Dec 2009 16:25:00 EST. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Permalink   |  sourceAll Things Digital, AppleInsider  | Email this | Comments

, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

No Comments


Magazine publishers announce joint digital distribution scheme
The joint venture between four leading publishers has issued a press release highlighting a few of the finer points of its plan to create a platform for digital magazine distribution -- we guess that The New York Observer wasn't kidding when it said that a deal between Conde Nast, Hearst, Meredith, News Corporation, and Time Inc. was imminent. Essentially a vehicle for selling publications for just about any device (including smartphones, e-readers, and laptops), the content will be optimized for multiple operating systems and display sizes, and according Time exec John Squires, it will all be DRM-free. They've yet to announce a name for this beast -- although we're leaning towards Magulu (or, perhaps, the iMags Store). PR after the break.

Continue reading Magazine publishers announce joint digital distribution scheme

Magazine publishers announce joint digital distribution scheme originally appeared on Engadget on Tue, 08 Dec 2009 11:19:00 EST. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Permalink   |   | Email this | Comments

, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

No Comments


Magazine publishers said to be ‘very close’ to digital distribution deal
Rumors of magazine publishers striking a deal to make their content available for digital devices -- even a certain tablet -- have been around for quite a while now, but it looks like something may finally be close to really happening. As The New York Observer reports, Time Inc. exec John Squires has been taking the lead on the initiative (and is apparently set to become interim head of the new company), which would see rival publishers including Time, Condé Nast and Hearst join together to make over 50 magazines available in digital form, and for a variety of devices. Details are otherwise a bit light, as you might expect, but one source familiar with the situation reportedly says "it's very close and more imminent than it's been," while others familiar with the plans say they "compare to iTunes," and that you'll be able to buy "new and distinct iterations" of magazines like of The New Yorker or Time -- and even actual print editions, for that matter.

Magazine publishers said to be 'very close' to digital distribution deal originally appeared on Engadget on Tue, 24 Nov 2009 12:33:00 EST. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Permalink AppleInsider  |  sourceNew York Observer  | Email this | Comments

, , , , , , , , , ,

No Comments


Creative Zii MediaBook Could Combine eBook and PMP Features [Ebooks]

Details are sparse at the moment, but what we do know today is that Creative is hard at work developing a "MediaBook" device that will combine video, pictures and text with what could be described as an eBook form factor.

Creative is also talking with publishers, a la Apple, although in their case the talks are primarily in Singapore, where they already have a number of e-learning initiatives.

Images were unavailable, although Engadget did manage to snag a source who snapped a blurry pic of the Creative UI reveal (pictured) earlier today. There will be a touchscreen, which would make this slate/tablet markedly different than an ebook like the Kindle, although somewhat similar to the Nook. That's all for now. [Epizenter via Engadget]




, , , , , , ,

1 Comment



SetPageWidth