Posts Tagged ‘Dyson air multiplier’

How Dyson’s Blade-less Fan Works [Infographics]

In case my passionate summary wasn't enough, this info-clip will demonstrate how Dyson's Air Multiplier moves air without blades—except that it fails to mention that there are still blades inside the machine (that factoid kills the magic). [boingboing]




, , , ,

No Comments


James Dyson Lightning Interview: A Mac Man With a Bladeless Fan [Interview]

Sir James Dyson is more than a guy who makes unusually interesting vacuums. He makes unusually interesting fans, too! We got a (very brief) chance to talk to the man about his tech allegiances, his design philosophy, and more.

In all seriousness, Dyson's legacy is about more than a few home appliances—though they're no doubt impressive. He's a brilliant designer and inventor in an industry starved for brilliant designers and inventors; he's got a clear enthusiasm for what he does, and he's become a sort of evangelist for engineering and inventing; also he's a nerd. I had, like, three minutes with the man, but managed to blurt out a couple questions.

We started on tech:

Giz: PC or Mac?

Sir James: (Emphatically) Mac! Since 1984. I bought the first Macintosh.

Giz: What kind of phone do you carry?

Sir James: Well, I have a BlackBerry and an iPhone.

Giz: Are there any unlikely companies or designers that you see doing really interesting stuff right now?

Sir James: There's my son, who does lights where he varies the angle of the light in quite an interesting manner.

Giz: So they're not lasers?

Sir James: No, they're regular lights. They're floor lights where the shade goes up and down to create a wide or narrow beam. There are wall and ceiling lights which have barn doors as a shade; you get an amazing effect on the wall. I don't know if nepotism is allowed on Gizmodo. [Ed. note: It is! So here's how they work:]

We also run a student competition around the world, and there are some really interesting ideas that come out of that.

Giz: You're fond of removing requisite parts from things—bags from vacuums, blades from fans—is there any particular part in another device that you just want to get rid of?

Sir James: Well, I'm sure there will be, but I don't think we should talk about it now. But yes, it is quite a nice approach to minimalism, removing things—well, removing things that cause problems; that's the point.

Giz: Have you thought about directing your talents away from domestic inventions, and toward something more altruistic? Do you have any projects or dreams outside the world of Dyson?

Sir James: (Laughs) I'd like to do a better vacuum cleaner, but there's all sorts of things I want to do. We're very interested in encouraging people to get into design. In the West, we're training far too few engineers and scientists. Schoolchildren love science and love technology, but somehow their parents, teachers and society tells them that other things are going to be far more interesting, so I'm on a bit of a mission to try and change that.

And as quickly as he stepped into my mic range, he stepped back out. Later, James!

You can read Mark's review on Dyson's $300 bladeless Air Multiplier fan here, as well as the rest of our Dyson coverage.




, , , , , ,

No Comments


Dyson’s Air Multiplier is the overpriced bladeless fan you never asked for
We can't fault Dyson for chutzpah. After putting the company's spin on vacuum cleaners and then hand dryers, we probably should've guessed that a revolution in table fan engineering was next up. When we first saw an image of the Dyson Air Multiplier "bladeless fan" a few spurious theories popped into our heads as to how it works, but it didn't take long to figure it out: it has blades in it. It's just that these blades are inside the lower canister, rather similar to, dare we say it, how a vacuum cleaner is set up, with the air then routed through the ring up top. The benefits of this tech are that there are no nasty blades to get fingers caught up in, but also that there's no "buffeting" -- that on-off gush of air caused by fan blades unceremoniously chopping up the air into inelegant segments. Unfortunately, the downside of the Dyson method is that you can't make Darth Vader voices through the backside of the fan, and the whole assembly is closer in noise pollution to that of an actual vacuum cleaner than a regular table fan. And then there's the matter of price: $300 for the 10-inch model, $330 for the 12-inch, and neither of them offer nearly as much wind as a regular fan this size -- quite a steep entry fee for the gentle breezes that emanate out of this plastic wind tunnel. Full PR is after the break.

Continue reading Dyson's Air Multiplier is the overpriced bladeless fan you never asked for

Filed under:

Dyson's Air Multiplier is the overpriced bladeless fan you never asked for originally appeared on Engadget on Mon, 12 Oct 2009 19:01:00 EST. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Permalink | Email this | Comments

, , , , , , , , ,

No Comments


Dyson Air Multiplier Review: Making a $300 Fan Takes Cojones [Review]

Dyson's newest invention, a window fan with no blades, is the most opulent, most eye-catching and most ludicrously overpriced gadget the company has released yet. And I sort of love it.

Price

The Air Multiplier runs $299 for the 10-inch version and $329 for the 12-inch version. I tested the 10.

How a Blade-Less Fan Works

So how does a fan without blades, a hula hoop on a stick, essentially, work? The bottom grills are for the air intake, powered by what I'm assuming is an internal fan. (Oh, this fan has a fan, you just don't see it.)
Still, you just barely feel the Multiplier breathing in. As this air is transported up through the device, it makes its way through the "loop amplifier" (that big loopy part), accelerating the air 15-fold as it's squeezed through a 1.3mm aperture around the ring. Sticking your hand through the loop, you'll feel air only in front of the ring because that's where you'll find the aperture. It's a mind-bending sensation to say the least.

The Experience

I'll admit it though, even knowing how the fan works now, all I could think was that it looked like a giant magnifying glass when I first opened the box.

I tentatively plugged the all-plastic device in, hit a button I could only assume was for power, and the device roared to life like a very wussy hairdryer. My face was greeted with the same quality of air: a relentless, even stream that felt a tad more industrial than residential.
The focused breeze was surprising but not quite hurricane-worthy. (Later I found the air output to measure 119 gallons per second. That output is about on par with at least one 10-inch commercial-grade fan shy of the $200 mark, and a $30, 8-inch duct fan produced about half that. Most consumer-grade fans don't disclose air power.)

And, exploring the device more, I realized that while it didn't look like any fan I'd used before, it worked almost exactly like every fan I'd used before.

For instance, one button toggled oscillation. Another twisted to rev the air speed (a smoother gradient of the traditional low, medium and high controls). And the base could be pushed forward or back, tilting the entire device in a manner more elegant but not entirely different from my $10 job in the next room.
Indeed, the Air Multiplier was the most beautiful fan I'd ever used, but it was still, at its plebeian heart, a window fan.

The Shame

Truthfully, I'm almost embarrassed for liking the Air Multiplier. There's no doubt that any Dyson vacuum demands a price premium for its fashion-forward design. But ultimately, this premium is relatively small. All good vacuums cost a few hundred bucks, so the Dyson upsell is somewhat reasonable—temping even.
$300 for a fan is far, far from an upsell when I can get 95% of the experience for $10 at Walmart. Even as a good fan...even as a beautiful fan...even as a clever fan that blocks less window light...even as a safe fan that your toddler or pet can examine without injury...I'm downright humiliated for liking it, especially in this economy.

But like it, I do.


Completely unique design

Safe (no external moving parts)

No doubt, it's great at fanning

Probably easier to knock-off than a vacuum

Not loud, but far from silent

Costs about a bajillion times more than any fan I've ever bought




, , , , , ,

No Comments



SetPageWidth