Posts Tagged ‘Dyson’
Industrial robot arm pretends to do chores in Dyson’s London pop-up shop
Posted by: Gadget Boy in Gadget News, Technology on December 13th, 2009
[Image courtesy of Mark Hattersley]
Industrial robot arm pretends to do chores in Dyson's London pop-up shop originally appeared on Engadget on Sun, 13 Dec 2009 18:01:00 EST. Please see our terms for use of feeds.
Permalink |
Design Week | Email this | Comments Dyson DC25 Blueprint impressions: is the ‘Ball’ worth it?
Posted by: Gadget Boy in Gadget News on October 27th, 2009

Continue reading Dyson DC25 Blueprint impressions: is the 'Ball' worth it?
Filed under: Household
Dyson DC25 Blueprint impressions: is the 'Ball' worth it? originally appeared on Engadget on Tue, 27 Oct 2009 10:16:00 EST. Please see our terms for use of feeds.
Permalink | Email this | CommentsHow Dyson’s Blade-less Fan Works [Infographics]
Posted by: Gadget Boy in Gadget News on October 19th, 2009
In case my passionate summary wasn't enough, this info-clip will demonstrate how Dyson's Air Multiplier moves air without blades—except that it fails to mention that there are still blades inside the machine (that factoid kills the magic). [boingboing]
I Would Love For Dyson To Make a Spoon That Propelled Food Into My Mouth [Humor]
Posted by: Gadget Boy in Gadget News on October 15th, 2009
This cartoon by Lunchbreath illustrates additional opportunities for Dyson to profit mightily off the the technology that went into his new Air Multiplier fan.
I mean yeah, the prices are a joke, but how many of you would actually consider spending $400 on a spoon that eliminated one step in the eating process while simultaneously increasing the volume of food you can consume at one time? Be honest. [Flickr via Core77 via PopSci]
James Dyson Lightning Interview: A Mac Man With a Bladeless Fan [Interview]
Posted by: Gadget Boy in Gadget News on October 15th, 2009
Sir James Dyson is more than a guy who makes unusually interesting vacuums. He makes unusually interesting fans, too! We got a (very brief) chance to talk to the man about his tech allegiances, his design philosophy, and more.
In all seriousness, Dyson's legacy is about more than a few home appliances—though they're no doubt impressive. He's a brilliant designer and inventor in an industry starved for brilliant designers and inventors; he's got a clear enthusiasm for what he does, and he's become a sort of evangelist for engineering and inventing; also he's a nerd. I had, like, three minutes with the man, but managed to blurt out a couple questions.
We started on tech:
Giz: PC or Mac?
Sir James: (Emphatically) Mac! Since 1984. I bought the first Macintosh.
Giz: What kind of phone do you carry?
Sir James: Well, I have a BlackBerry and an iPhone.
Giz: Are there any unlikely companies or designers that you see doing really interesting stuff right now?
Sir James: There's my son, who does lights where he varies the angle of the light in quite an interesting manner.
Giz: So they're not lasers?
Sir James: No, they're regular lights. They're floor lights where the shade goes up and down to create a wide or narrow beam. There are wall and ceiling lights which have barn doors as a shade; you get an amazing effect on the wall. I don't know if nepotism is allowed on Gizmodo. [Ed. note: It is! So here's how they work:]

We also run a student competition around the world, and there are some really interesting ideas that come out of that.
Giz: You're fond of removing requisite parts from things—bags from vacuums, blades from fans—is there any particular part in another device that you just want to get rid of?
Sir James: Well, I'm sure there will be, but I don't think we should talk about it now. But yes, it is quite a nice approach to minimalism, removing things—well, removing things that cause problems; that's the point.
Giz: Have you thought about directing your talents away from domestic inventions, and toward something more altruistic? Do you have any projects or dreams outside the world of Dyson?
Sir James: (Laughs) I'd like to do a better vacuum cleaner, but there's all sorts of things I want to do. We're very interested in encouraging people to get into design. In the West, we're training far too few engineers and scientists. Schoolchildren love science and love technology, but somehow their parents, teachers and society tells them that other things are going to be far more interesting, so I'm on a bit of a mission to try and change that.
And as quickly as he stepped into my mic range, he stepped back out. Later, James!
You can read Mark's review on Dyson's $300 bladeless Air Multiplier fan here, as well as the rest of our Dyson coverage.
Dyson’s Air Multiplier is the overpriced bladeless fan you never asked for
Posted by: Gadget Boy in Gadget News on October 13th, 2009
Continue reading Dyson's Air Multiplier is the overpriced bladeless fan you never asked for
Filed under: Household
Dyson's Air Multiplier is the overpriced bladeless fan you never asked for originally appeared on Engadget on Mon, 12 Oct 2009 19:01:00 EST. Please see our terms for use of feeds.
Permalink | Email this | CommentsDyson Air Multiplier Review: Making a $300 Fan Takes Cojones [Review]
Posted by: Gadget Boy in Gadget News on October 12th, 2009
Dyson's newest invention, a window fan with no blades, is the most opulent, most eye-catching and most ludicrously overpriced gadget the company has released yet. And I sort of love it.
Price
The Air Multiplier runs $299 for the 10-inch version and $329 for the 12-inch version. I tested the 10.
How a Blade-Less Fan Works
So how does a fan without blades, a hula hoop on a stick, essentially, work? The bottom grills are for the air intake, powered by what I'm assuming is an internal fan. (Oh, this fan has a fan, you just don't see it.)
Still, you just barely feel the Multiplier breathing in. As this air is transported up through the device, it makes its way through the "loop amplifier" (that big loopy part), accelerating the air 15-fold as it's squeezed through a 1.3mm aperture around the ring. Sticking your hand through the loop, you'll feel air only in front of the ring because that's where you'll find the aperture. It's a mind-bending sensation to say the least.

The Experience
I'll admit it though, even knowing how the fan works now, all I could think was that it looked like a giant magnifying glass when I first opened the box.
I tentatively plugged the all-plastic device in, hit a button I could only assume was for power, and the device roared to life like a very wussy hairdryer. My face was greeted with the same quality of air: a relentless, even stream that felt a tad more industrial than residential.
The focused breeze was surprising but not quite hurricane-worthy. (Later I found the air output to measure 119 gallons per second. That output is about on par with at least one 10-inch commercial-grade fan shy of the $200 mark, and a $30, 8-inch duct fan produced about half that. Most consumer-grade fans don't disclose air power.)
And, exploring the device more, I realized that while it didn't look like any fan I'd used before, it worked almost exactly like every fan I'd used before.
For instance, one button toggled oscillation. Another twisted to rev the air speed (a smoother gradient of the traditional low, medium and high controls). And the base could be pushed forward or back, tilting the entire device in a manner more elegant but not entirely different from my $10 job in the next room.
Indeed, the Air Multiplier was the most beautiful fan I'd ever used, but it was still, at its plebeian heart, a window fan.
The Shame
Truthfully, I'm almost embarrassed for liking the Air Multiplier. There's no doubt that any Dyson vacuum demands a price premium for its fashion-forward design. But ultimately, this premium is relatively small. All good vacuums cost a few hundred bucks, so the Dyson upsell is somewhat reasonable—temping even.
$300 for a fan is far, far from an upsell when I can get 95% of the experience for $10 at Walmart. Even as a good fan...even as a beautiful fan...even as a clever fan that blocks less window light...even as a safe fan that your toddler or pet can examine without injury...I'm downright humiliated for liking it, especially in this economy.
But like it, I do.
Completely unique design
Safe (no external moving parts)
No doubt, it's great at fanning
Probably easier to knock-off than a vacuum
Not loud, but far from silent
Costs about a bajillion times more than any fan I've ever bought
Dyson D25 Blueprint, In Photos [Image Cache]
Posted by: Gadget Boy in Gadget News on October 6th, 2009
Review: Dual Wielding Dyson D31s [Vacuums]
Posted by: Gadget Boy in Gadget News on September 1st, 2009
Dyson's D31 handheld vacuum contains the world's fastest motor capable of reaching 104,000 RPM. So what happens when you fire two at once? All. Hell. Breaks. Loose. And you suck a lot of cat hair off the couch.
The Price
D31 (orange): $220
D31 Animal (purple): $270

The Difference
The stock D31 and the D31 Animal are essentially the same vacuum. They contain the same motor, the same battery capacity and the same accessories...save for one. The Animal has a motorized hair-scraping attachment (familiar to many Dyson users) that requires a power line be run to the nozzle. Otherwise, they're pretty much identical.
The Results
After about 3 days of my cat's lounging, our couch tops get wretched. Our general solution is to take a vacuum hose, then do cleanup with one of those sticky pet hair brushes. It's labor intensive, and I'd be lying if I said we were willing to go through the process more than once a week. So I tried the D31 Animal. Pulling the trigger, it whirs to 0-100 instantly, like a power drill, while a hairdryer-worthy gust of air fires from the back.
Here's our couch before and after about 5 minutes of vacuuming with the Animal. 80% of the hair came up after two quick passes—really impressive stuff. But that last 20 percent stuck around for a while. And even after several minutes, and even hitting the boost power button, the results weren't perfect (you can see a few stubborn stray hairs). But they were adequate—and maybe even more importantly—as successful as my full-sized standup Animal vacuum (which has worked better than other nice vacuums I've tried). That's pretty remarkable since we're talking about a 2.2lb handheld vac.
Other vacuuming jobs are less exciting, but completely effective. Using the brush and corner attachment, any little particle you can imagine disappears into the machine. I can't imagine a small job it couldn't handle other than carpets. If you want to spot clean your rug, the base D31 doesn't really have an attachment for that (the Animal brush sorta works with a price premium). But dust, loose dirt, little pieces of unidentified food—no problem. And all the junk empties out of the one-button release hatch at the bottom of the collection tank...save for fur, which will make you dig a bit.
The Nitpicking
I'd like one feature added to the D31/Animal: cruise control. As pitiful as this sounds, it gets tiring holding down the button. I know. Mock me. But while the vacuum is light as can be to your arm, your hand still gets exhausted squeezing the trigger.
You'll also only get 10 minutes of run time (or 6 in high power mode) for 3 1/2 hours of charging. That's actually more than enough time to complete most work (you don't really go nonstop with anything but pet hair), but when you run out of juice (the device goes from 100% to none without warning) you can't just continue vacuuming with a power cord. You'll need to recharge and wait.
The Practicality
Ignoring the price for a moment, I wonder who would actually need this much power in a handvac—other than for the obvious—pet owners. Because the D31 can't (and isn't trying to) replace a full-sized vacuum, meaning it's only going to serve as backup. But then again, if you have the extra cash to pick up one of your own, maybe your chief concern isn't one of pure practicality. And I can't completely fault you for that. [Dyson]
Light and manageable design
Lots and lots of power
The Animal attachment cuts through hair well
Run time is adequate but not very long
Trigger can be tiring to hold
No carpet attachment for spot cleaning
I mean, obviously, we're talking about $220+ dust busters here
James Dyson’s ‘Wrong Garden’ Optical Illusion Makes Water Flow Uphill [Illusions, Michael]
Posted by: Gadget Boy in Gadget News on August 24th, 2009
This fountain, created by inventor James Dyson and inspired by MC Escher, has water flowing up a series of ramps. Or so it appears to.
It's actually a pretty ingenious optical illusion. Water is pumped out of the tops of each ramp, cascading water down both the ramp and over its edge. Bubbles rising inside each ramp give the illusion of water flowing uphill, and all together it makes it look like the water is defying gravity. Pretty amazing stuff, and it took a solid year to design and build.
You can go check it out at the Chelsea Garden Show in England if you're in the area. [BBC via Oh Gizmo! via The Daily What]







